References

====//The following page contains a list of all literature referred to within the wiki, detailing author(s), report names and publication titles in an APA style. The web link will also be included where possible. The wiki uses an APA referencing style and any reports, studies, quotes and facts mentioned in it should be referenced where possible. For tips on using the APA style visit// []====

Bergstrom, J. M., & O’Brien, L. A. (2001). Themes of discovery. //Educational Leadership, 58//(7), 29-33.

Berk, L. E. (2001). //Development through the lifespan// (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1999). //In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms.// Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Brown, M. (2005). Learning Spaces. In Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.), //Educating the net generation// (pp. 12.1-12.22). Educause. Retrieved 28 October, 2010, from [|www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/]

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The art of discovery. //Harvard Educational Review, 31,// 21-32.

Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. //International Journal of Education Research, 17,// 457-470.

Chinn, C. A., & Hung, C. C. (2007). Learning to reason about the methodology of scientific studies: A classroom experiment in the middle school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. //Review of Educational Research, 77//(1), 113-143.

Daniels, H. (2001). //Vygotsky and pedagogy.// London: RoutledgeFlamer.

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). //E–Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice//. London: Routledge/Falmer.

Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B., & Soloway, E. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curriculum in the context of urban reform. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45//(8).

Gipps, J. (2002). Data logging and inquiry learning in science. Proceedings from the Seventh World Conference on Computers in Education, Copenhagen, Denmark. Australian Computer Society Inc. Retrieved 8 November, 2010, from [].

Greeno, J., & Goldman, S. (Eds.). (1998). //Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning.// Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). //Educational Psychologist, 42//(2), 99–107. Retrieved October 13, 2010, from [].

Hurd, P. D. (1969). //New directions in teaching secondary school science.// Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Kirschner, P., Seweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. //Educational Psychologist, 41//(2), 75-86.

Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42,// 921-946.

Martin, D. J. (2009). //Elementary Science Methods: A constructivist approach.// (5th ed.). CA: Wadsworth Cengage. Retrieved 30 October, 2010, from Google Books [].

Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? //The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59,// 14-19.

Moll. L. C. (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of socialhistorical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pine, J., & Aschbacher, P. (2006). Students’ learning of inquiry in “inquiry” curricula. //Phi Delta Kappan, 88//(4), 308-313.

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. //Journal of Educational Psychology, 95//(4), 667-686.

Richardson, W. (2006). //Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms.// Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Schroeder, R., Steed, A., Axelsson, A. S., Heldal, I., Abelin, A., Widestrom, J., Nilsson, A., Slater, M. (2001). Collaborating in networked immersive spaces: As good as being there together? //Computers and graphics, 25//(5), 781-788.

Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., & Chambers, J. C. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. //Educational Psychologist, 35//(4), 165-178.

Slavin, R. E. (2003). //Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice.// 9th Edition. Columbus, Ohio: Pearson.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Waxman, H. C., Padron, Y., & Arnold, K. (2001). Effective instructional practices for students placed at risk of academic failure. In G. Borman, S. Stringfield, & R. Slavin (Eds.), //Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads.// Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.